A fence option is a three-legged options trading strategy used to hedge a long stock position while controlling both upside and downside. A fence option combines a long stock holding, a long put, a short call, and a short put, creating a defined range for both profit and risk.
This structure is attractive for investors in India who seek to protect their equity exposure, especially when markets are expected to remain stable or moderately bullish. The main goal is to reduce hedging costs—often to zero or even a net credit—while still offering limited downside protection.
A fence strategy in options trading is a structured, three-part hedge for a long stock position, often called a collar with a short put.
The fence strategy is achieved by holding the underlying stock, buying a put (to protect against minor falls), selling a call (to cap gains), and selling an additional, lower-strike put (to help pay for the hedge).
Unlike a regular collar, the extra short put in a fence means there is more downside risk if the stock price falls sharply.
This trade-off allows the investor to often set up the hedge at a net premium credit or zero cost, making it attractive during periods of low volatility. A fence strategy is particularly useful when you want to retain stock ownership and avoid paying high premiums for protection.
It is popular in the Indian market, especially among traders with large holdings in blue-chip stocks or indices. The strategy suits those who are comfortable with limited gains and controlled losses, in exchange for lower hedging expenses.
The fence is a flexible tool, but it comes with complex margin requirements and the potential for substantial loss if the stock falls below the lower short put strike.
A fence works by combining a stock holding with a protective put, a short call, and an additional short put to create a cost-efficient hedge with capped gain and loss levels.
The objective is to provide downside protection for a long equity position, but at little or no cost—sometimes even generating a small net credit.
Trade Structure
Net Premium
Rs. 30 (put bought) – Rs. 25 (call sold) – Rs. 10 (put sold) = Rs. 5 net credit.
Payoff Structure
Tthe fence is often used to hedge large positions with an average cost reduction of 50-100% versus buying a protective put alone.

The fence’s payoff chart shows a flat gain above the call strike, a steady loss zone between the two puts, and an accelerated loss below the lowest put.
An example of a fence trade starts with owning a stock and layering three options to define the profit and loss range.
Suppose you own 1 lot (100 shares) of Reliance at Rs. 2,400.

Net premium
Rs. 22 (put bought) – Rs. 18 (call sold) – Rs. 10 (put sold) = Rs. 6 net credit per share.
If Reliance rises above Rs. 2,500 at expiry, you are obligated to sell at Rs. 2,500, locking in a profit of Rs. 100 per share plus the net premium.
Your gain is capped, but you are protected against a sharp drop.
If Reliance falls below Rs. 2,350 but stays above Rs. 2,250, your total loss is limited to Rs. 100 per share minus the net premium.
If Reliance falls below Rs. 2,250, you start facing significant losses, as you must buy additional shares at Rs. 2,250 no matter how low the market price falls.
This example highlights how the fence offers capped profit, limited loss over a range, and significant risk only if the stock collapses far beyond the short put.
Investors use a fence strategy to hedge long equity positions at low or no net cost, while accepting limited upside in exchange for reduced hedging expenses.

This approach is especially useful for those who want to protect their portfolio against small-to-moderate declines without spending much on premiums. Here are the benefits.
A fence is often used during earnings season or before major policy events, when stock volatility can spike. The fence strategy is ideal for investors willing to accept capped gains in exchange for cost savings and a clear profit/loss range.
A fence strategy suits investors with a moderately bullish or neutral outlook, who are willing to accept limited upside in exchange for lower hedging costs.

It is especially effective when you want to reduce the premium cost of a regular collar and are comfortable holding stock through a specific price range. Let us look at some ideal situations.
Fences are common for large-cap stocks before quarterly results, where volatility is high and hedging costs spike. Investors use this Option trading strategy to lock in gains or protect capital temporarily, often rolling the position as the outlook changes.
To structure a fence trade, follow these steps to combine stock ownership with three strategic options positions.

Example:
The net premium is often zero or slightly positive, resulting in a low-cost hedge with defined risk and reward bands.
Ensure you monitor margin requirements, especially for the extra short put, as significant losses can occur if the stock falls sharply.
The payoff structure of a fence features limited maximum gain, a small loss zone, and potentially large loss if the stock falls below the short put.
This unique combination creates a payoff graph that is flat at the top, dips slightly in the middle, and drops steeply at the bottom.

Payoff zones
Example:
This structure suits investors who want capped profits, shallow risk in a defined range, but are willing to accept deep risk only in extreme scenarios.
Profit, loss, and breakeven in a fence strategy are determined by the option strikes, premiums, and the movement of the underlying stock.
The maximum profit is capped, losses are limited within a range, and breakeven points are wider than in a collar due to the extra premium collected from the short put.
Key profit/loss points
Fences often have wider breakeven bands than collars, reflecting the extra income from the sold put.
This makes them attractive for cost-conscious investors but requires careful monitoring if the stock price approaches the short put.
Yes, a fence strategy is profitable in stable or slightly bullish markets, offering small upside potential and controlled loss.
This approach works best when the premium collected from selling options offsets the cost of buying protection.
The risk-reward profile is asymmetric: you risk large losses only in a market crash, but most of the time, profits are steady and predictable.
The strategy is less profitable than aggressive bullish strategies but provides more stability.
The main risks of a fence strategy are large losses if the stock price falls below the short put, capped profit from the covered call, and complex margin requirements.

Always assess your willingness to buy more stock at much lower prices and ensure you have the margin to cover potential losses.
Not managing these risks can result in large, unexpected losses, especially during market crashes.
The main difference between a fence and a collar is that a fence adds a short put to the collar structure, increasing risk in exchange for a wider breakeven and more premium.
Both strategies use a long stock, a long put, and a short call, but only the fence includes an extra short put.
| Feature | Collar | Fence |
| Components | Stock, Long Put, Short Call | Stock, Long Put, Short Call, Short Put |
| Downside Risk | Limited | Unlimited below short put |
| Premium Cost | Usually debit | Usually credit or zero |
| Breakeven Band | Narrow | Wider |
| Profit Cap | Yes | Yes |
The fence is more aggressive, offering more premium income but exposing the trader to higher risk if the stock falls sharply.
Choose a collar for more conservative risk management, and a fence if you desire a larger breakeven band and are comfortable with higher downside risk.
Alternatives to the fence strategy include the collar, protective put, covered call, put spread, and iron condor, each offering different risk-reward profiles.
The choice depends on your outlook, risk tolerance, and cost considerations.
| Strategy | Components | Risk Profile | Cost/Net Premium |
| Collar | Long Stock, Long Put, Short Call | Limited downside, capped upside | Usually small debit |
| Protective Put | Long Stock, Long Put | Pure downside hedge, unlimited upside | High debit |
| Covered Call | Long Stock, Short Call | Capped upside, no protection | Credit |
| Put Spread | Long Put, Short Put | Limited risk, bearish | Debit |
| Iron Condor | 2 Calls + 2 Puts, 4 strikes | Range-bound returns, limited risk | Credit |
Choose a strategy aligned with your market view, capital, and risk appetite.
Different approaches work better at different times; always weigh cost, risk, and reward before deciding.
Arjun is a seasoned stock market content expert with over 7 years of experience in stock market, technical & fundamental analysis. Since 2020, he has been a key contributor to Strike platform. Arjun is an active stock market investor with his in-depth stock market analysis knowledge. Arjun is also an certified stock market researcher from Indiacharts, mentored by Rohit Srivastava.
Sunder Subramaniam combines his extensive experience in fundamental analysis with a passion for financial markets. He possesses a profound understanding of market dynamics & excels in implementing sophisticated trading strategies. Sunder’s unique skill set extends to content editing, where he leverages his insights to develop equity analysis strategies at Strike.money.
Stay informed with Strike's guide on in-depth stock market topic exploration.
From basics of stock market, technical analysis, options trading, Strike covers everything you need as a trader.
No Comments Yet.